[ad_1]
I was surprised to read a recent article, “Maryland Governor Wes Moore and state prosecutors promise juvenile justice accountability and service” (February 20). Governor Wes’ team stated: Moore and the state’s attorneys for Baltimore City and Prince George’s County plan to “hold juvenile offenders accountable for their crimes” and “ensure that children receive the rehabilitation they need. We are promoting a system in which the role of
Is everyone afraid to state the obvious fact that there is someone responsible for the actions of children, especially their own children? How can you hold a “child” who doesn’t even have a legal income responsible for damage caused by a car that collides with another car? Or is “accountability” limited to penalties and rehabilitation time charged to taxpayers, and it is insurance companies that are actually responsible for that cost, and of course, particularly in urban areas, those same taxpayers’ insurance Will it mean higher fees?
I believe that if we go back to the basics of making parents responsible for their children, we can really stem the tide of a myriad of problems in law enforcement, streets, schools, etc., and we can reduce incarceration and rehabilitation. . There was a time when parents were obligated to repair the window of a neighbor’s house if their child broke it. If parents have no responsibility for their offspring, how was this responsibility resolved until it was deemed acceptable?
What started as a slogan, “It takes a village to raise a child,” has taken on the weight of, “Let it take a village to raise a child.” This has had dire consequences for cities, neighborhoods, auto insurance premiums, and the population as a whole.
— Georgia Corso, Baltimore
Add your voice: Reply to this article or other Sun content by submitting your own letter.
[ad_2]
Source link
